4th IPM Symposium
Scott Swinton, Michigan State Univ.
Abstract :
Economic assessments of IPM are aimed at public program
assessment; hence they focus on specific outcomes, rather
than simply practice adoption. The first round of economic
assessments of IPM programs were often as simple as partial
budget profitability analyses. During the past two decades,
huge strides have been made in incorporating environmental
and health factors into economic analyses, either as trade-offs
or as monetary valuations. Recent efforts have been made
to incorporate such "non-market" values into aggregate
welfare impact analyses. So far, these efforts have been
restricted to well-defined practices on individual crops
within individual states. Finding a cost-effective way to
aggregate over the diverse fields of IPM implementation
at a national scale remains a formidable challenge, even
when restricted to traditional, pesticide-reliant, threshold-based
IPM programs. As IPM programs move more toward biological
controls and ecosystem management, new methods will be needed
for economic assessment. In particular, bioeconomic and
biophysical models will be needed to simulate interactions
among climate, predators, parasitoids, pests, their hosts
and valued products and services affected by pests in order
to estimate how managed ecosystems evolve with and without
IPM interventions.
Powerpoint Presentation :
Economic Assessment of IPM
Programs
