Chemical Hazard Evaluation for Management Strategies
Chemical Hazard Evaluation for Management Strategies
Mary Swanson led a group of researchers who designed the CHEMS 1 environmental indicator model. This model assesses potential risk with a ranking methodology that calculates hazards to human health and the environment. The model considers the environmental impact of chemicals on air, soil, groundwater, and surface water. It examines such factors as the chemical's propensity to cause abnormal effects in mammals and how much of the chemical is already present in the environment because of industrial uses.
Reference:
- Swanson, M., Davis, G., Kincaid, L., Schultz, T., Bartmess, J., Jones, S., George, E., 1997. A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 16 (2), 372-383.
To arrive at an assessment of risk the CHEMS 1 model calculates hazard values for a variety of variables in three separate sections: human health effects, environmental effects, and exposure factor. These sections are then incorporated in equation (1) which calculates a total hazard value.
- Total hazard value = (human health effects + environmental
effects)*exposure factor
For each variable in each section, a ranking methodology is used to score chemical hazard values based on certain toxicity information and chemical parameter information. These values are then added to arrive at hazard values for the specific sections. Then, these hazard values can be multiplied by a "release weighting factor" that takes into account how much of the pesticide is already in the environment. - Human Health Effects = HVor + HVinh + HVcar + HVnc
HVor = 6.2 - 1.7(logLD50) for 5mg/kg < LD50 £ 5000 mg/kg
= 0 for LD50 > 5000 mg/kg
= 5 for LD50 £ 5 mg/kgHVinh = 8.0 - 2.0(log LC50) for 31.6 ppm £ LC50 £ 10000 ppm
= 0 for LC50 > 10000 ppm
= 5 for LC50 < 31.6 ppm(Note: LD50 and LC50 values are from rats)
HVcar = 0 for Group E EPA carcinogen class
= 0 for Group D EPA carcinogen class
= 1.5 for Group C EPA carcinogen class
= 3.5 for Group B2 EPA carcinogen class
= 4.0 for Group B1 EPA carcinogen class
= 5.0 for Group A EPA carcinogen class
HVnc = Mutagenic Effects + Developmental Effects + Reproductive Effects + Neurotoxic Effects
(Note: for each effect present a score of 1 is assigned. If no effect is present, a score of 0 is assigned). - Environmental Effects = HVmam + HVfa + HVfc
HVmam = 6.2 - 1.7(logLD50) for 5mg/kg < LD50 £ 5000 mg/kg
= 0 for LD50 > 5000 mg/kg
= 5 for LD50 £ 5 mg/kg
(Note: LD50 values are from rats)HVfa = -1.67(logLC50) + 5.0 for 1 mg/L £ LC50 < 1000 mg/L
= 0 for LC50 ³ 1000 mg/L
= 5 for LC50 < 1 mg/L
(Note: LC50 values are from fish)HVfc = 3.33 - 1.67(log NOEL) for 0.1 mg/L < NOEL £ 100 mg/L
= 0 for NOEL > 100 mg/L
= 5 for NOEL £ 0.1 mg/L
(Note: NOEL values are from fish). - Exposure Factor = HVbod + HVhyd + HVbcf
HVbod, hyd = 1 for hydrolysis half-life £ 4 days
= 2.5 for hydrolysis half-life > 500 days
= 0.311(LN hydrolysis half-life) + 0.568
for 4 days < hydrolysis half-life £ 500 daysHVbcf = 0.5(log BCF) + 0.5 for 1.0 < log BCF £ 4.0
= 1 for log BCF £ 1.0
= 2.5 for log BCF > 4.0 - Release-Weighted Hazard Values
For active ingredients already released.
RWF = LN (chemical releases) - 10For pesticide applications
RWF = LN(actual application rate) +A
= 1 for actual application rate < B
where:
A = 10 - LN (Maximum application rate)
B = e(1-A)wHVor = (HVor)(RWFw)
wHVinh = (HVinh)(RWFa)
wHVcar = (HVcar)(RWFt)
wHVnc = (HVnc)(RWFt)
wHVmam = (HVmam)(RWFw)
wHVfa = (HVfa)(RWFw)
wHVfc = (HVfc)(RWFw)
List of Symbols :
|
Symbol
|
Description & Units
|
| actual application rate | lbs/acre of active ingredient applied |
| chemical releases | lbs of chemical already in the environment |
| HVbcf | hazard value for aquatic bioconcentration |
| HVbod | hazard value for biodegradation |
| HVcar | hazard value for carcinogenicity |
| HVfa | hazard value for acute toxicity to fish |
| HVfc | hazard value for chronic toxicity to fish |
| HVhyd | hazard value for hydrolysis degradation |
| HVinh | hazard value for acute inhalation toxicity |
| HVmam | hazard value for acute oral toxicity for mammals |
| HVnc | hazard value for chronic, non-cancer toxicity |
| HVor | hazard value for acute oral toxicity |
| maximum application rate | maximum amount of active ingredient recommended for a growing season according to the pesticide's label (lbs/acre) |
| RWFw | release weighting factor for water |
| RWFa | release weighting factor for air |
| RWFt | total release weighting factor |
In order to use CHEMS1 at the farm level, assumptions have
to be made. First, it has to be assumed that CHEMS1 could
be used on the smaller scale of a farm field since it was
specifically designed to assess the effects of large amounts
of chemicals already in the environment due to industrial
production. To accomplish this, the way the model takes into
account how much pesticide is already in the environment has
to be adjusted to reflect the smaller amounts of chemicals
typically seen on the farm level. This adjustment is observed
in the pesticide application section of Equation (v) and was
suggested by Mary Swanson, one of the authors of the CHEMS1model.
Second, the model requires the use of "biological oxygen
demand half lives." These values can be difficult to
determine and may have to be left blank when using this model
at the farm level.
